Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Con Todo y Contradicciones's avatar

There something I reflect every time I read your essays about existential health and that I have not yet learned how to metabolize: the relationship with injustice. I can make amends with grief, death, uncertainty, religious deconstruction. I can recognize belonging, responsibility, love, etc. But I cannot reconcile, or accept the history of a violent, genocidal human kind as it is without experiencing deep emotions. I would love to hear your thoughts about this.

Jim Van Overschelde's avatar

@Jim, I am still trying to understand what you mean by existential health (EH).

In this article, you say EH "asks how we inhabit meaning, identity, freedom, responsibility, uncertainty, belonging, love, grief, mortality, and reality" and you say, EH is strong when we "inhabit existence as it actually is."

These two pieces together imply to me that existence contains meaning, identity, etc. That meaning exists and we simply have to inhabit or fully live in it.

For me, a person has strong EH when s/he has done extensive deconstruction of their self concept (i.e., narrative self). This enables them to live more fully in the Here and Now - to experience life more directly. This person is largely free of inherited beliefs, should, etc. In this clear state, we don't inhabit meaning or identity. Instead, we *construct* meaning or identity - intentionally and consciously, when it is needed.

The idea that life has no meaning unless I give it meaning has been a challenge for me to embrace, but every experience of life I have - prior to the mind's interpretations - has NO meaning, only existence. The mind then generates meaning based on goals, expectations, prior experiences, and prior knowledge.

How can we inhabit meaning/identity when we must first construct it? Or, are you saying, once we consciously construct the meaning or identity, then we should fully inhabit it? Thanks for clarifying.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?